Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - CA$225.0 vs CA$479.97
- Up to 45% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-13700F - CA$1.68 vs CA$3.08 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-8600K - 156 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 24 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
134
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$225
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
156
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.08/FPS
54%
Price, CA$
CA$479.97
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$479.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8600K | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |