Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1006 days older than Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 6% better in Starfield than Core i5-8400T - 56 vs 53 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
56
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$260.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$260.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6479 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1099
84.99613302397525%
Multi-Core
3884
93.81642512077295%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |