Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 796 days older than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - CA$210.0 vs CA$218.88
- Up to 2% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i7-6700K - CA$1.19 vs CA$1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i5-8400 - 179 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
177
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$210
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17837 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
179
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.22/FPS
97%
Price, CA$
CA$218.88
95%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17836 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |