Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$235.0 vs CA$1230.54
- Up to 77% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-13400F - CA$1.18 vs CA$5.21 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Rust than Core i5-7600K - 236 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
200
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$235
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
236
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.21/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$1230.54
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,230.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |