Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - CA$153.92 vs CA$805.43
- Up to 77% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-12900F - CA$0.85 vs CA$3.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 21% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-7600 - 220 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 24 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
182
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.66/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$805.43
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$805.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |