Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 2144 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - CA$41.21 vs CA$258.88
- Up to 83% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-6900K - CA$0.18 vs CA$1.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-760 - 240 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
229
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
240
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.08/FPS
16%
Price, CA$
CA$258.88
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |