Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 915 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 60% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$98.89 vs CA$250.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 3600XT - CA$0.97 vs CA$2.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-7500T - 112 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
102
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.23/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$250
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7500T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |