Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1777 days newer than Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-750 - 236 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
229
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$25.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$25.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2352 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-750 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |