Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than FX-8300 - 214 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - CA$83.46 vs CA$250.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i5-7400T - CA$0.4 vs CA$1.17 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
214
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.17/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$250
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
211
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |