Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600T outperforms Core i7-4800MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600T is 794 days newer than Core i7-4800MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-4800MQ - 121 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i7-4800MQ - 35 vs 47 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 8 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-6600T
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i7-4800MQ |
|---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 47 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
