Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1764 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - CA$244.5 vs CA$375.13
- Up to 28% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-10700F - CA$1.32 vs CA$1.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 10% better in Rust than Core i5-6600T - 204 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
185
90.68627450980392%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$244.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$244.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58092 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.84/FPS
71.73913043478261%
Price, CA$
CA$375.13
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$375.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58092 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1181
73.26302729528535%
Multi-Core
3223
44.57198174526345%
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |