Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2084 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - CA$118.88 vs CA$196.23
- Up to 36% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11400F - CA$0.89 vs CA$1.4 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-6600 - 140 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
134
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$118.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$118.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17102 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
140
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
63%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |