Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600 is 649 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 1400 - 185 vs 178 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-6600 - CA$87.08 vs CA$141.97
- Up to 36% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-6600 - CA$0.49 vs CA$0.77 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.77/FPS
63%
Price, CA$
CA$141.97
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$141.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
178
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |