Buy on Amazon
CA$853.06
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $192
Availability
MSRP in USD: $192
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i5-6500TE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3011 days newer than Core i5-6500TE.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500TE
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Lost Ark than Core i5-6500TE - 316 vs 247 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500TE - 32 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Intel Core i9-14900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) up to 5.8 GHz
Buy for CA$853.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74455 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-6500TE
Desktop • Oct 11th, 2015
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-6500TE
Desktop • Oct 11th, 2015
Single-Core
1118
37.019867549668874%
Multi-Core
3081
16.863711001642038%
Intel Core i5-6500TE | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 11th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i5-6500TE or Core i9-14900F
Lost Ark, 1920 x 1080, Very High
252 FPS
CA$12.3/FPS
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Core i9-14900F
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
CA$3,099.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
