Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6500 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6500 is 770 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6500
- Performs up to 0% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 333 vs 332 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$105.65 vs CA$1393.07
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6500 - 32 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$105.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76678 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
332
99.69969969969969%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
7%
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76678 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
99.49022939677145%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i5-6500 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |