Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1189 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$122.15 vs CA$1149.12
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-6400 - 165 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 24 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for CA$122.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76164 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
165
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1111
87.20565149136577%
Multi-Core
3023
40.55540649315804%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |