Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 402 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 183 vs 182 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 8 vs 4 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-5675C
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
81.19402985074626%
Multi-Core
3898
95.56263790144644%
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
