Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Core i5-540M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 1251 days newer than Core i5-540M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-540M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Core i5-540M - 677 vs 669 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-540M - 8 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i5-540M
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-540M | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
