Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i5-480M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2363 days newer than Core i5-480M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-480M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-480M - 162 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-480M - 64 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-480M | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
Arrandale | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |