Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 181 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 7% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1620 - 165 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-4670K - CA$32.99 vs CA$98.99
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 55 vs 84 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for CA$98.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76169 minutes ago
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
32.58964143426295%
Multi-Core
723
20.400677200902933%
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |