Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i5-4570T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1949 days newer than Core i5-4570T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 12% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-4570T - 110 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570T - 24 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
110
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1029
80.76923076923077%
Multi-Core
1994
26.750737858867723%
Intel Core i5-4570T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |