Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i5-450M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3504 days newer than Core i5-450M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-450M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-450M - 159 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-450M - 12 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
159
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$140.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$140.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-450M | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |