Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4300M outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4300M is 690 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Performs up to 31% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-4100 - 301 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 37 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |