Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i5-3570K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 862 days newer than Core i5-3570K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570K
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 77 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 6% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-3570K - 500 vs 471 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570K - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3570K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
