Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-3570 outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-3570 is 233 days newer than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3570
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8150 - 156 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than FX-8150 - CA$62.72 vs CA$93.19
- Up to 35% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8150 - CA$0.4 vs CA$0.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3570 - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
156
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$62.72
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$62.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59174 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
151
96.7948717948718%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
64.51612903225808%
Price, CA$
CA$93.19
67%
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3570 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |