Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Core i5-3550S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 862 days newer than Core i5-3550S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550S
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-3550S - 124 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550S - 20 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3550S | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |