Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i5-3470T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2733 days newer than Core i5-3470T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 17% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-3470T - 374 vs 321 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470T - 64 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
374
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1676.73
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,676.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
565
34.53545232273839%
Multi-Core
1135
8.102512849800114%
Intel Core i5-3470T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |