Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$53.99 vs CA$418.54
- Up to 86% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-10900 - CA$0.21 vs CA$1.49 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Core i5-3470 - 280 vs 257 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 20 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
257
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$53.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$53.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12356 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.49/FPS
14%
Price, CA$
CA$418.54
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$418.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12357 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |