Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400T outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400T is 1677 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - CA$53.99 vs CA$250.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-7400T - CA$0.36 vs CA$1.61 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-3470 - 155 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
151
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$53.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$53.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12234 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
155
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.61/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$250
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |