Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$195.52 vs CA$388.0
- Up to 46% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-10900F - CA$0.85 vs CA$1.58 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-3450S - 246 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 20 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
231
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$195.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$195.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16952 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.58/FPS
53%
Price, CA$
CA$388
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16953 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |