Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - CA$195.52 vs CA$330.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-10700K - CA$1.16 vs CA$1.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-3450S - 180 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
168
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$195.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$195.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14545 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.83/FPS
63%
Price, CA$
CA$330
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14545 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |