Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1929 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 14% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$310.76 vs CA$360.9
- Up to 11% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$1.45 vs CA$1.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-3450S - 222 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 24 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
215
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$310.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$310.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6139 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
222
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.63/FPS
88%
Price, CA$
CA$360.9
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$360.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |