Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450S outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3450S is 200 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Performs up to 3% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than FX-8150 - 155 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-3450S - CA$87.12 vs CA$327.14
- Up to 73% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i5-3450S - CA$0.58 vs CA$2.11 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 8 vs 4 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
155
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.11/FPS
27%
Price, CA$
CA$327.14
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$327.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
151
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |