Buy on Amazon
CA$189.41
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $174
Availability
MSRP in USD: $174
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 1259 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i7-965 - 169 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 77 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 8 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-3450 Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53450
Buy for CA$189.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77378 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
485
80.43117744610282%
Multi-Core
1683
94.49747332959012%
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
