Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2917 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 29% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - CA$127.87 vs CA$180.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing Elden Ring than Ryzen 3 3100 - CA$1.14 vs CA$1.48 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3450 - 122 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
112
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$127.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$127.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15980 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.48/FPS
77%
Price, CA$
CA$180
71%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15981 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |