Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms Core i5-3340M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 2050 days newer than Core i5-3340M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3340M
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 35 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i5-3340M - 150 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3340M - 64 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3340M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3340M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 13th, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
