Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i5-3317U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2733 days newer than Core i5-3317U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 17 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 14% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-3317U - 213 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3317U - 48 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
213
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1670
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,670 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10693 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3317U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |