Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Core i5-3230M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2303 days newer than Core i5-3230M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3230M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Core i5-3230M - 153 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3230M - 16 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
153
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$597.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$597.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3230M | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |