Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-3210M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1917 days newer than Core i5-3210M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3210M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 19% better in Rust than Core i5-3210M - 185 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3210M - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57641 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
493
42.20890410958904%
Multi-Core
999
17.241974456334137%
Intel Core i5-3210M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |