Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Core i5-2537M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 1315 days newer than Core i5-2537M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2537M
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 17 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Dishonored 2 than Core i5-2537M - 261 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2537M - 16 vs 4 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2537M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
2.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 85 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |