Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Core i5-2500S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 2823 days newer than Core i5-2500S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500S
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 9% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Core i5-2500S - 85 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500S - 48 vs 4 threads
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
85
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1783
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,783 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
586
47.44939271255061%
Multi-Core
1492
20.1431078709329%
Intel Core i5-2500S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |