Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Core i5-2467M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3576 days newer than Core i5-2467M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2467M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 53% better in Rust than Core i5-2467M - 228 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2467M - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
228
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$216.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$216.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1356 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2467M | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |