Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i5-2467M vs Celeron G3900

Core i5-2467M vs Celeron G3900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i5-2467M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1553 days newer than Core i5-2467M.

Advantages of Intel Core i5-2467M

  • Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 17 vs 51 Watts
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Performs up to 3% better in Valorant than Core i5-2467M - 694 vs 674 FPS
This is a free version of Valorant.
Valorant

Valorant

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Core i5-2467M Logo
Core i5-2467M

Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011


FPS

674

97%

Value, CA$/FPS

Price, CA$

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

694

100%

Value, CA$/FPS

CA$0.03/FPS

100%

Price, CA$

CA$21.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Celeron G3900 2.8 Processor - Affordable and Reliable

Buy for CA$21.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 34 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Core i5-2467M Logo
Core i5-2467M

Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i5-2467M Logo
Core i5-2467M

Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011


Single-Core

334

57%

Multi-Core

649

65%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

100%

Multi-Core

992

100%

Intel Core i5-2467M Logo

Intel Core i5-2467M

vs
Intel Celeron G3900 Logo

Intel Celeron G3900

Jun 1st, 2011Release Date
Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5CollectionCeleron
Sandy BridgeCodenameSkylake
Intel BGA 1023SocketIntel Socket 1151
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
2Cores2
4
Threads2
1.6 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.8 GHz
2.3 GHzTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
17 W
TDP51 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
16.0xMultiplier
28.0x
Intel HD 3000Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 510
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.