Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Core i5-2467M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 741 days newer than Core i5-2467M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2467M
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 17 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2467M - 153 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2467M - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
153
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.57/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$546.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$546.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10597 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2467M | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
2.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |