Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i5-2435M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3164 days newer than Core i5-2435M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2435M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 15% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-2435M - 136 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2435M - 20 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$329.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65578 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2011
Single-Core
481
28.69928400954654%
Multi-Core
924
10.966057441253264%
Intel Core i5-2435M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |