Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2186 days newer than Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Lost Ark than Core i5-2400 - 228 vs 226 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
