Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 734 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - CA$323.83 vs CA$752.63
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-12900F - CA$1.47 vs CA$3.38 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-14400F - 223 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
220
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$323.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$323.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
223
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.38/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$752.63
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$752.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |