Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 3781 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 35% better in Rust than Core i3-4130 - 239 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - CA$85.99 vs CA$324.69
- Up to 64% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-14400F - CA$0.49 vs CA$1.36 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
239
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.36/FPS
36%
Price, CA$
CA$324.69
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$324.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
177
74%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$85.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$85.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |