Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4053 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 26% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1620 - 147 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - CA$36.89 vs CA$324.34
- Up to 86% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-14400F - CA$0.32 vs CA$2.21 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
147
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.21/FPS
14%
Price, CA$
CA$324.34
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$324.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
117
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |