Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 1273 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - CA$323.78 vs CA$3288.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - CA$1.72 vs CA$16.95 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-14400F - 194 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400F - 64 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
188
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.72/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$323.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$323.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$16.95/FPS
10%
Price, CA$
CA$3288
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$3,288 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 32 |
16 | Threads | 64 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |